is contemplating taking a job as a public defender or as an associate at a criminal defense firm where, unlike Scott, she would not have the luxury of picking and choosing whom she represents. If anything, its a Rorschach why voting should be compulsory essay test. . Scott apparently accepts the newbies notion that our goal as criminal defense attorneys cannot be simply to win at all costs, since (he writes) our defense of a client must be within the bounds of the law and we must never knowingly present false testimony.
Suppose we give the newbie lawyer whose blog post Scott found so objectionable the benefit of the doubt to cairo university thesis which we should generally accord all people. Given the jurys favorable verdict, I can surmise that the jury might have found this appeal by the defense to justice appealing. But there was a time, including after Id graduated from law school, when considerations related to the question made criminal defense appear not very attractive. While we will never knowingly present false testimony, we will use true testimony to whatever benefit we can for our client. Explore the Cambridge Dictionary. And its also fair to point out that crimes which are inherently repulsive to every decent human being are precisely the kinds of crimes laypeople probably have in mind when they ask us at cocktail parties (or in my case, beer-fueled poker games) how. Im sure that Scott believes even such defendants are entitled to a defense. If youre looking for an alternative, try.
Get our free widgets. Add the power of Cambridge Dictionary to your website using our free search box widgets.