lot of lower- and working-class patients, and one complaint I hear again and again is that their organization wont promote them without a college degree. When youve got that much riding on a decision, you want the best decision-maker possible that is, you want to choose the head of the Federal Reserve based on merit. The real solution to this problem is the one none of the anti-meritocracy articles dare suggest: accept that education and merit are two different things! Maybe someone who didnt get the best grades in college has the right skills to be a nurse, or a firefighter, or a police officer. The problem isnt just getting into college. Then they go to Harvard and dazzle their professors with their sparkling wit and dapper suits.
Ulysses Grant graduated in the bottom half of his West Point class, but turned out to be the only guy capable of matching General Lee and winning the Civil War after a bunch of superficially better-credentialed generals failed. To reflect on the immateriality of human deserts is not a denial of choice; it is a denial of self-determination. I dont believe that an individuals material conditions should be determined by what he or she deserves, no matter the criteria and regardless of the accuracy of the system contrived to measure. I dont think the writers of the anti-meritocracy articles above really disagree with this.
Term paper on rosa parks, Meteorology research paper, Conditional probability research paper, Pcp research paper,
Youd prefer they be given out based on merit? One of ohns hopkins thesis requirement the few places I see this going well is in programming. But havent you read. But I think its important to defend the word meritocracy as meaning what it says decision by merit, rather than by wealth, class, race, or education and as a good thing. Grant that this is all true, and that its bad. Some of these people are too poor to afford to go to college. If some rich parents pay for their unborn kid to have experimental gene therapy that makes him a superhumanly-brilliant economist, and it works, and through no credit of his own he becomes a superhumanly-brilliant economist then I want that kid in charge of the Federal. And if you care about saving ten million peoples jobs, you do too. Some of these people will be the academic stars who learned how to do it at Harvard Business School. Im just saying that in a world where somebody has to be an investment banker, a surgeon, or a Federal Reserve chair, Id rather choose them by true meritocracy than by anything else.) see here for more discussion. Some of them have been specifically told You do great work, and we think youd be a great candidate for a management position, but its our policy that we cant promote someone to a manager unless theyve gone to college. Remember that IQ correlates with chess talent at a modest.24, and chess champion Garry Kasparov has only a medium-high IQ of 135.